How accurate is radioactive dating dating site for sex offenders

Rated 4.92/5 based on 663 customer reviews

Early geologists, in the 1700s and 1800s, noticed how fossils seemed to occur in sequences: certain assemblages of fossils were always found below other assemblages. Since 1859, paleontologists, or fossil experts, have searched the world for fossils.

In the past 150 years they have not found any fossils that Darwin would not have expected.

Current understanding of the history of life is probably close to the truth because it is based on repeated and careful testing and consideration of data.

The rejection of the validity of fossils and of dating by religious fundamentalists creates a problem for them: Fossil sequences were recognized and established in their broad outlines long before Charles Darwin had even thought of evolution.

First, it provides no evidence whatsoever to support their claim that the earth is very young.

how accurate is radioactive dating-27

how accurate is radioactive dating-1

how accurate is radioactive dating-42

how accurate is radioactive dating-41

Creationists seem to think that a few examples of incorrect radiometric ages invalidate all of the results of radiometric dating, but such a conclusion is illogical.

For example, the element Uranium exists as one of several isotopes, some of which are unstable.

When an unstable Uranium (U) isotope decays, it turns into an isotope of the element Lead (Pb).

Other critics, perhaps more familiar with the data, question certain aspects of the quality of the fossil record and of its dating.

These skeptics do not provide scientific evidence for their views.

Leave a Reply